Legal Opinion

Mohn v. Mohn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1887No. 12,979PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, C. J.

Appellant has assigned as error the sustaining of a demurrer to his complaint.

In the first paragraph the following are stated as facts: Appellant was the owner of a tract of land. Appellee requested him to convey it to a third person in order that it might be conveyed to her. • At the same time she agreed that if he would do so she would hold the land in trust for him, *286and that, if it should be sold by her, she would hold the proceeds in trust for him. Relying upon that agreement, which, was in parol, appellant conveyed the land to the designated third person, and caused him to convey it to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mescall v. TullyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Post v. LoseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Westerfield v. KimmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Buchanan v. LeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Cooper v. ThomasonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Estate of Stanley v. PenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Noe v. RollIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Haxton v. McClarenIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API