Legal Opinion

Chen v. Barr

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 20, 2019No. 17-4103Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17-4103 Chen v. Barr BIA Leeds, IJ A206 067 415 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Victor Paul v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Sk Shahriair Majidi v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. Jigme Wangchuck v. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Felix Norbert Siewe v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Li Hua Lin v. United States Department of Justice Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API