Legal Opinion · Dissent

Luis M. Rivera v. Evangelio La Porte

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 16, 1990No. 668, Docket 89-7699Published

1Dissent

MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge:

(Dissenting).

I respectfully dissent.

The majority opinion characterizes the procedure in the district court as impaired in critical respects affecting the jury’s consideration of the case. However, there are too many defects to be cured to accept the result as serving the ends of justice.

In my opinion, the inadequacy and the inconsistency of the jury’s responses cannot be overlooked or explained away successfully. The case was tried at a single trial on a single count complaint asserting a rolled-up liability of the defendant for various reasons scattered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Franki Foundation Company, a Corporation v. Alger-Rau & Associates Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. VaterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  5. Ricard v. BirchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API