Legal Opinion

Curlender v. Bio-Science Laboratories

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1980No. Civ. 58192PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON (Bernard), P. J.

Plaintiff Shauna Tamar Curlender, a child, by her father, Hyam Curlender, as guardian ad litem, sought damages for personal injury from defendants Bio-Science Laboratories, a corporation, Automated Laboratory Sciences, 1 a corporation, and Jerome Schaffer, M.D. 2 At first, defendants attacked the sufficiency of the third cause of action set forth in the complaint, a cause of action based upon alleged fraud; eventually, however, defendants demurred to the first amended complaint in its entirety on the ground that it had failed to state a cause of action in its…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Turpin v. SortiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Procanik by Procanik v. CilloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Blake v. CruzIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API