Curlender v. Bio-Science Laboratories
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JEFFERSON (Bernard), P. J.
Plaintiff Shauna Tamar Curlender, a child, by her father, Hyam Curlender, as guardian ad litem, sought damages for personal injury from defendants Bio-Science Laboratories, a corporation, Automated Laboratory Sciences, 1 a corporation, and Jerome Schaffer, M.D. 2 At first, defendants attacked the sufficiency of the third cause of action set forth in the complaint, a cause of action based upon alleged fraud; eventually, however, defendants demurred to the first amended complaint in its entirety on the ground that it had failed to state a cause of action in its…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
- Turpin v. SortiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Procanik by Procanik v. CilloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Blake v. CruzIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.