Legal Opinion

Nave v. Baird

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1859PublishedCited by 26 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecmoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Baird sued Nave upon a promissory note for 200 dollars.

Answer by way of counter-claim, alleging that the note was given in consideration that said Baird, an attorney at law, should attend to a certain cause then pending against said Nave in the. Fountain Circuit Court; that Baird did not, in a skillful manner, conduct the defense of the cause, *319and refused to obey the instructions of his client in these particulars, viz.: that he refused to apply for a change of venue therein, and refused to put in the testimony of certain witnesses. It is further alleged that judgment went against Nave,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P. v. Givaudan Flavors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Duke & Co. v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Goble v. DillonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Capron v. . DouglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API