Citizens Nat. Bank v. Forman's Assignee
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 25 — Action to Recover Double the Amount oe Usurious Interest Alleged to Have Been Paid to Defendant APPEAL FROM BOYLE CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Defendant and Plaintiff Appeals.
1Dissent
*222Dissenting opinion of
Judge Hobson
in which Judges Guffy and Burnam concur:
The majority opinion is rested upon the case of McBroom v. Investment Co., 153 U. S., 318 (14 Sup. Ct., 852; 38 L. Ed., 729), which was based upon a statute of New Mexico materially different from the national banking act quoted. The majority opinion does not refer to the fact that in several cases the United States Supreme Court had previously announced the opposite rule under the national banking act, and that at the conclusion of the McBroom opinion these previous decisions are expressly referred to, and held' not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Barnet v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Brown v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- McBroom v. Scottish Mortgage & Land Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Driesbach v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.