Di Gennaro v. Rubbermaid, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HOEVELER, District Judge.
Pursuant to the requirements of Fed. R.Civ.P. 52, the following facts and conclusions of law are made. In this case, Mar-gitta Di Gennaro and Core Products Europe, Inc. (“Di Gennaros”), have sued Rubbermaid, Inc. (“Rubbermaid”), alleging that Rubbermaid is hable for damages in the amount of $1,691,298.08 because Rubbermaid failed to reimburse them for time and expenses incurred in selling products which Rubbermaid later decided not to manufacture. During a nine-day, bench trial, which began on June 4, 2002, this Court heard the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Farrington v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hazen v. Cobb-Vaughan Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Miller v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. VogelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Beebe v. the Columbia Axle Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Speakman v. Allmerica Financial Life Ins. & Annuity Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005