Fido's Fences, Inc. v. Radio Systems Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge:
Plaintiff Fido’s Fences, Inc. (“Fido’s”) brings this action against defendants Radio Systems Corp. (“RSC”) and Invisible Fence, Inc. (“Invisible Fence”) under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C: § 15, alleging principally that defendants monopolized and attempted to monopolize the market for electronic pet containment systems and three submarkets in violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and refused to deal and tied the purchase of replacement batteries to the purchase of complete pet containment systems in violation of section 1…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Biocad JSC v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- 605 Fifth Property Owner, LLC v. Abasic, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Chestnut Hill NY, Inc., Jae Curtis, Thomas Riker, and John Sturm v. The City of Kingston, NY; The City of Kingston Zoning Board of Appeals; The City of Kingston Planning Board; Steven Noble, individually and in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Kingston; Suzanne Cahill, individually and in her capacity as City Planner for the City of Kingston; Stephan Knox, individually and in his capacity as Code Enforcement Officer and/or Building Inspector for the City of Kingston; Bartek Starodaj, individually and in his capacity as Director of Housing Initiatives for the City of Kingston; Egidio Tinti, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Kingston; and Eric J. Vanallen, individually and in his capacity as Sergeant on the City of Kingston Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026
- Cleveland v. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Dayes v. Watertown City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.