Legal Opinion

White v. Peabody

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Monroe; Kinne, J. Trespass guare clausum, fregit by Horace White against Lucien V. Peabody. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

Plaintiff brought trespass in justice’s court, describing his close as “Lot No. 10, and the adjoining portion of lot 12, occupied and owned by said plaintiff, in the Pusey plat in said village, and being the lot and land occupied as a homestead by said plaintiff.” Defendant gave notice:

“That the title to lands will come in question, and that, before the committing of the said supposed acts complained of in the plaintiff’s declaration, the village of Dundee had purchased a strip of land on lot 12 for a highway, and that whatever of the acts of the defendant complained of by the plaintiff were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Diehl v. ZangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Smith v. HamiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Stewart v. CarletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Joyce v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Jones v. PashbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kitchen v. ChantlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Grell v. GanserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Wilson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Rix v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Tritt v. HooverMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API