Legal Opinion

Speights v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 1996No. 94-3002Published

1Opinion of the Court

POLEN, Judge.

Joseph Speights appeals his conviction for aggravated assault, armed robbery, grand theft auto and resisting arrest without violence. We reverse, finding the trial court erred by failing to accept the defendant’s race neutral explanation for a peremptory challenge.

During the voir dire phase of the trial, the defense moved to strike Ernie Chipman, a white male, from the jury panel. The state objected, claiming Speights was using peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner. When pressed by the court for an explanation, Speights cited Mr. Chipman’s extensive jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  4. State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. State v. SlappySupreme Court of Florida · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API