Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. National Urological Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided June 4, 2008No. Civil Action 1:04-CV-3294-CAPPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLES A. PANNELL, Jr., District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the following motions: (1) the defendants’ mo tion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 168]; (2) defendant Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (“Hi-Tech”) motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 170]; (3) the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 172]; and (4) the defendants’ motion to strike the declaration of Jennifer A. Thomas [Doc. No. 214].
I. Case Overview
A. The Plaintiff
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) is an independent agency of the United States Government created by statute. 15 U.S.C. §§ 41-58. The…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Federal Trade Commission v. On Point Capital Partners LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Federal Trade Commission v. Washington Data ResourcesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
- State Of Washington v. Living Essentials, Llc, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Federal Trade Commission v. RCA Credit Services, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.