Legal Opinion

People v. Erts

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1988PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We agree with the Appellate Division majority that defendant made a prima facie showing that the uncalled witness possessed knowledge on the critical issue in the case— i.e., whether it was defendant who sold the drugs — and that the trial court’s refusal to give a "missing witness” charge constituted reversible error. In People v Gonzalez (68 NY2d 424), we explained that a defendant seeking the charge has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing of entitlement. Thereafter, the court must give the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. VillaniNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. TabarezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. People v. KitchingNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. SchoolfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Vermilyea v. VermilyeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Schmidlapp v. SchmidlappAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API