Legal Opinion

People v. Villani

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1983PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed, without prejudice, however, to an application by the People, if they be so advised, for leave to resubmit the charge of criminal usury in the second degree (People v Mayo, 48 NY2d 245, 253).

Defendant argues that he was denied due process because the prosecutor (1) concealed the fact that Ralph Porpora, an employee of defendant, had denied in testimony before the Grand Jury ever receiving from the com*783plaining witness any money or envelope for transmittal to defendant, and (2)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. MayoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. SteadmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. ErtsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. People v. SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API