Rager v. L. & W. R. R.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 99. — ACTION BY G. RAGER, BY HIS STATUTORY GUARDIAN, AGAINST THE LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY FOR PERSONAL INJURIES. — Appeal from, Muhlenberg Circuit Court. "W. P. Sandidge, Circuit Judge. Judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Wm. Rosees Clay, Commissioner
— Affirming.
The appellant, G-. Rager, an infant nine years of age, together with his statutory guardian, by this action .sought to recover of appellee in the court below $5,000 damages for an alleged injury to his foot, caused, as charged, by the negligence of the latter, its servants and employes, in leaving a truck so near its track at Bevier that a moving train struck and drove it against appellant’s foot as he was passing, thereby inflicting the injury complained of. Appellee’s answer traversed the averments of the petition, and alleged…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alexander v. HumberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Eversole v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Commonwealth v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
3Cited by7 opinions
- Willis' Administratrix v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Rietze v. Williams Ex Rel. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Romans v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Lassiter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.