Legal Opinion
Roe Ex Rel. Roe v. Keady
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 15, 2003No. 02-3167PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Richard and Janet Roe, adoptive parents to Robert Booth Roe, a minor plaintiff, along with his conservator, brought suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 against defendants, employees of the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services (“SRS”), for failing to conduct a proper inquiry into abuse by his natural parents, Terri and Booth Tuthill. They alleged that defendants had a duty to investigate concerns about possible abuse voiced before and after Robert’s birth, that defendants relied improperly on the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) to look into and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health ClinicSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Olsen v. Layton Hills MallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Jamie S. Nabozny v. Mary Podlesny, William Davis, Thomas BlauertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schaefer v. Las Cruces Public School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Griego v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Gerald v. LocksleyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Hunter v. the Buckle, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Matrai v. DirecTV, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.