Commonwealth v. Johnson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this appeal we are called upon to determine whether common intent to commit or facilitate the commission of a felony or misdemeanor in the course of committing disorderly conduct is necessary to prove riot under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5501. We find that it is not and affirm.
The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows. On October 25 and 26, 1991, a riot broke out among the inmates at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill, Pennsylvania. After being informed that a riot was making its way toward the G-Block, Officer Keefer and two other officers locked themselves…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. CasperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. RomeriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. BryantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Acceptance Insurance Company Appellant v. Robert H. SloanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Acceptance Insurance v. SloanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- P & F Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Borough v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Com. v. Douglas, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.