Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1992No. 150PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this appeal we are called upon to determine whether common intent to commit or facilitate the commission of a felony or misdemeanor in the course of committing disorderly conduct is necessary to prove riot under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5501. We find that it is not and affirm.

The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows. On October 25 and 26, 1991, a riot broke out among the inmates at the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill, Pennsylvania. After being informed that a riot was making its way toward the G-Block, Officer Keefer and two other officers locked themselves…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. CasperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. RomeriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. BryantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Acceptance Insurance Company Appellant v. Robert H. SloanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Acceptance Insurance v. SloanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. P & F Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Borough v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Com. v. Douglas, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API