Stueding v. Seattle Electric Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered March 26, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for injuries sustained by a pedestrian struck by a street car.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
The defendant operates a double track electric street railway, known as the Eastlake line, on Fourteenth avenue northeast, in the city of Seattle. The avenue runs north and south, and is intersected by East Forty-seventh street, which runs east and west. The outbound car runs on the east track and the inbound car runs on the west track. The distance between the east rail of the east track and the curb on Fourteenth avenue is thirteen feet, seven inches. The distance between the rails of the respective tracks is four feet, eight and one-half inches. The distance between the tracks is five…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Baltimore Traction Co. v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Fluhart v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Richmond v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Reed v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jaquith v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Herrett v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Golay v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Hines v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Cole v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.