Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Board of Selectmen

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 2, 1994No. 92-P-1456PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although this action by a former employee of the town of Marshfield was pleaded, in the first line, as an application for mandamus to compel the appointing authority (the board of selectmen) to reinstate him in his position, it is better viewed — as all now seem to agree — as an action testing his right to a hearing before that authority.

George Shaw was a non-civil service, nonunion, at will employee who, commencing in 1983, worked in the town’s purchasing department under the direction of the town administrator (see town charter, art. 4.7.2[3] for that official’s duty). Shaw held the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boston Teachers Union v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. City of Gloucester v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Debnam v. Town of BelmontMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Milne v. School Committee of ManchesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Martin v. CrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dupont v. Commissioners of Essex CountyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  2. Thibodeau v. Town of SeekonkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Raymond v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API