Legal Opinion

Kloock v. Rusnack Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1948No. Appeal, 190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

This is the second appeal in this equity proceeding. The factual background of the present controversy may be thus stated: Caroline Johnston owned a farm of 80 acres in Unity Township, Westmoreland. County. A public road running east and west divided it into two parts. South of the road she erected a dwelling house for her own use and piped water to it from a spring on her farm about 1100 feet north of the road. In 1902 and again in 1903 she conveyed the same lot, comprising one acre of land “having erected thereon a two story dwelling house, a frame stable and other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heffley v. LohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Ozehoski v. Scranton Spring Brook Water Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Weaver v. GetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  4. Werry Et Ux. v. SheldonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Kloock v. Rusnack Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Predwitch v. CHROBAK Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Bowley v. Koze, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API