Legal Opinion
Williamson v. Alldridge
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 21, 1970No. Civ. 70-268PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Petitioner proceeds under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 et seq., applying for a writ of habeas corpus to effect his release from the custody of the Respondent. According to the records of this case and evidence received by the Court at a hearing on Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, he was convicted by a military court martial while he was on active duty in Okinawa, having been charged with the crime of murder of a Ryukyuan citizen. When the crime was committed, Petitioner was properly absent from his duty post, in civilian clothes, and it may be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Downes v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- In Re RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Duncan v. KahanamokuSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schlomann v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- United States Ex Rel. Jacobs v. FroehlkeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
- Williams v. FroehlkeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Williams v. FroehlkeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Kenneth H. Schlomann v. R. I. Moseley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972