Legal Opinion

Mary Price v. Indiana Department of Child Services Director of Indiana Department of Child Services

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2017No. 49S05-1705-PL-285PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 49A05-1602-PL-380

Slaughter, Justice.

Judicial mandate is an extraordinary remedy—available only when the law imposes a clear duty upon a defendant to perform a specific, ministerial act and the plaintiff is clearly entitled to that relief. The law at issue here, Indiana Code section 31-25-2-5, imposes strict caseload limits for family case managers at the Indiana Department of Child Services. This statute compels a particular outcome—no case manager can oversee more than seventeen children at a time who are receiving services—but…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Flournoy v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. NOBLE CTY. COUNCIL ETC. v. State Ex Rel. FiferIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Knutson v. State Ex Rel. SebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Suzanne E. Esserman v. Indiana Department of Environmental ManagementIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Center for Wildlife Ethics, Inc. v. Cameron F. Clark, in his official capacity as Director of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Chosen Consulting LLC v. Town Council of Highland, IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
  4. Diego Morales v. John RustIndiana Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Emily Tingley v. First Financial Bank, As Trustee of Land Trust No. 428Indiana Court of Appeals · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API