Legal Opinion

State v. Byrd

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 2014No. ED 99366PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Introduction

GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., Judge.

Cemon Byrd (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. Defendant argues the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish his identity as the perpetrator of these crimes, and he argues the trial court committed error by allowing certain closing argument and testimony. We affirm.

Background

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence at trial was as follows. Martez Mayo (Victim) drove a gold GMC Yukon with tires, rims, and chrome door…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. State v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. State v. BaumrukSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. State v. HornbuckleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Tim Washington, Appellant/Defendant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State of Missouri v. Travis MooreheadMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State of Missouri v. Marcus WeaverMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. ROY BLACKSUREMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API