Legal Opinion

Pim v. Wait

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 12, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On Motion for Now Trial.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for negligence or misfeasance about the sale of some coffee which the defendants as brokers undertook to dispose of for the plaintiffs. Upon the trial by jury it appeared that the defendants bargained the coffee to Thompson Bros, at 91 cents per pound, and executed a “sold note,” so called, showing such sale; that afterwards, upon the authority of Thompson Bros., *742who assumed to act for Sherman & Taylor, the defendants canceled the sale to Thompson Bros., and took from them a sold note of the coffee from the plaintiffs to Sherman & Taylor, at 9$ cents,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pringle v. GuildU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API