Legal Opinion

Pringle v. Guild

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided January 14, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At 'Daw. On motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

This case now comes up on a motion for a new trial by the defendants. J. S. Guild and George M. Guild, the defendants, were under contract with the city of Columbia for the construction of a sewerage system in said city. To this end, they were authorized to open ground in the city, and make excavations necessary for the work. Among other places, the defendants constructed a tunnel on Indigo street, under the main track and siding of the Atlantic Coast Line Railway, and, for the purposes of the tunnel, dug a shaft or hole between these tracks; the said shaft or hole…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Nonce v. Richmond & D. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1887
  3. Bloomer v. DenmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Plummer v. Granite Mountain Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1893
  5. Pim v. WaitU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. MeldrumDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1906
  2. George v. Capital Traction Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1924
  3. Donohue v. DykstraDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1918
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Pound v. Wilcox Marketing IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API