Pringle v. Guild
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina
At 'Daw. On motion for new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.
This case now comes up on a motion for a new trial by the defendants. J. S. Guild and George M. Guild, the defendants, were under contract with the city of Columbia for the construction of a sewerage system in said city. To this end, they were authorized to open ground in the city, and make excavations necessary for the work. Among other places, the defendants constructed a tunnel on Indigo street, under the main track and siding of the Atlantic Coast Line Railway, and, for the purposes of the tunnel, dug a shaft or hole between these tracks; the said shaft or hole…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Nonce v. Richmond & D. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1887
- Bloomer v. DenmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
- Plummer v. Granite Mountain Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1893
- Pim v. WaitU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MeldrumDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1906
- George v. Capital Traction Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1924
- Donohue v. DykstraDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1918
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Pound v. Wilcox Marketing IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022