Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Gosnell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1909No. 15,660PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Harlan county: Ed L. Adams, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

The nature of this action is fully explained in an opinion written on a former appeal to this court, 76 Neb. 539. We there held that the petition stated a cause of action. The appeal is now upon the merits. The court found for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

The evidence, as might be expected, is contradictory, but it fairly appears that in 1900 Mrs. Drew owned 420 acres of land lying immediately north of plaintiff’s farm. Prairie Dog creek separated an irregular track of about ten acres on the south side of the Drew farm from the remainder thereof. Mrs. Drew agreed orally to convey said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lipp v. HuntNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Mohr v. RickgauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Morrison v. GosnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Properties, Inc. v. PflugNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ver Maas v. Culbertson, Roe & Bell, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Peterson & Vogt v. LivingstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API