Legal Opinion

Mid-Continent Properties, Inc. v. Pflug

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1977No. 40794PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.

This is an action by a real estate broker to recover a commission on the sale of real estate. The action was dismissed on the ground that the statute of limitations had run. We reverse the judgment of the District Court.

Plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, negotiated a sale of defendants’ property to Dowd Grain Company, Inc. Apparently plaintiff did not have a written broker’s contract with defendants, but in the contract of sale executed by defendants and Dowd Grain Company, Inc., a provision was inserted as follows: “Sellers agree to pay Mid-Continent Properties, Inc. a commission of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mohr v. RickgauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Svoboda v. De WaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Dowd Grain Co., Inc. v. PflugNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Pierce v. DomonNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Morrison v. GosnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weiner v. HazerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Eagle Partners, L.L.C. v. RookNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Eagle Partners v. RookNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Peterson & Vogt v. LivingstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API