Legal Opinion
United States v. Philip K. Shunk and Linda M. Shunk
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1997No. 96-60394PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
At issue is whether, in the light of the well-known proscriptions imposed by Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989), on retroactive application of new rules to collateral review proceedings, the rule established in United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506, 115 S.Ct. 2310, 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995) (materiality element for 18 U.S.C. § 1001 to be decided by jury, not judge), can be applied retrospectively in a § 2255 proceeding pertaining to a similar offense (18 U.S.C. § 1006). The district court held that it could not and,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Sean Lamar Sanders, A/K/A Sean Lamont SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Burdine v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. John C. Mandanici, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Romeo Trinidad Flores, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.