People v. Ramnaraine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that his admission to violating the conditions of his probation was not voluntary because the Supreme Court failed to advise him about the deportation consequences of his admission (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Vasquez, 85 AD3d 1068 [2011]; People v Decker, 83 AD3d 731, 732 [2011]). In any event, the Supreme Court’s failure to advise the defendant of the possible deportation consequences of admitting to a probation violation did not render his admission involuntary (see CPL 220.50 [7]; People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 403 [1995];…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. RohlehrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. WiedmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. GriffithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. SoriaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. DrammehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. HazelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. AlburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AlburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.