People v. Soria
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claims that the plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered, and that the County Court failed to advise him about the deportation consequences of his plea (see CPL 220.60 [3]; 470.05 [2]; People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; People v Henson, 96 AD3d 1076 [2012]; People v Ramnaraine, 92 AD3d 809 [2012]). Furthermore, the “rare case” exception to the preservation requirement does not apply here because the defendant’s allocution did not cast significant doubt on…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. DeBenedettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. DunneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. FakhouryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.