Legal Opinion

In re Staed

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 13, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtBubgess, J.

The petitioner is the sheriff of the city of St. Louis and is restrained of his liberty by one John N. Frank, the coroner of said city.

On the eleventh day of March, 1893, of the St. Louis criminal court, the state of Missouri recovered against one William Cockran her debt! for $500, together with costs on a forfeited recognizance given in said court, and on the twenty-first *538day of March next thereafter, an execution was duly issued by the clerk of said court, made returnable to said court on the first Monday of May following, and delivered the same to the petitioner on April 7th. There was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lightner v. SteinagelIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. State ex rel. Kansas City National Bank v. BootheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. State ex rel. Wilson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BockstruckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. State ex rel. Board of Education v. NastSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Reid v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Fiedler v. Bambrick Bros. ConstructionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API