Legal Opinion

Fonoti v. Nam

High Court of American Samoa

Decided September 11, 1986No. CA No. 112-85Published

1Opinion of the Court

On the night of May 21, 1985, defendant's porch fell onto plaintiff's car. Plaintiff's employee had parked the car in defendant's lot while shopping in defendant's store. He emerged to find the second-story porch resting on the car as well as on several other vehicles. The car was substantially destroyed.

*59The employee testified that the defendant, Mr. Nam, came out from the store and promised everyone that his insurance company would pay for all damages. Mr. Nam testified that he did no such thing but that the owner of the store building, who for some reason is not a party to this action, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. M. Holter Hardware Co. v. Western Mortgage & Warranty Title Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Jacobson v. Suderman & Young, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  3. Cachick v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API