Legal Opinion

Burpee v. Princeton Mun. Imp. Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 25, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

88 N.J. Super. 552 (1965)

213 A.2d 22

STERLING BURPEE, SR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

PRINCETON MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 14, 1965.

Decided August 25, 1965.

Before Judges GAULKIN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Leonard J. Felzenberg argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Roskein, Kronisch & Felzenberg, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel A. Bloom argued the cause for defendant-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.

Burpee was awarded workmen's…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Caputo v. Best Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Detlefs v. Town of WestfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  2. Raves v. County of Middlesex-Roosevelt HospitalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Maskell v. Mid-State Filigree SystemNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  4. Masterson v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  5. Owens v. C & R WASTE MATERIALSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API