Legal Opinion

Maskell v. Mid-State Filigree System

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 11, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KESTIN, J.A.D.

In this workers’ compensation matter, petitioner appeals from an allowance of counsel fees on the ground that the fees were inadequate because erroneously predicated. The fee allowance, $600 on a net award of $8,090, was apportioned forty percent to petitioner and sixty percent to respondent. Petitioner’s attorneys have represented that, should the allowance be increased, they will waive the portion attributable to petitioner. Thus, any conflict of interests has been eliminated.

Petitioner was injured in a work-connected accident. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caputo v. Best Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Burpee v. Princeton Mun. Imp. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. Detlefs v. Town of WestfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Fletcher v. EhrlichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. Raves v. County of Middlesex-Roosevelt HospitalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. QUERESHI v. Cintas Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API