Legal Opinion

Ehrhart v. Preferred Building & Loan Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 20, 1929No. [Nos. 16, 17, January Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

These two appeals in one record grow out of proceedings instituted to foreclose two mortgages from the appellants 1o the appellee on the same property. A petition was filed by the mortgagee in each case for a decree under the consent to a decree provision in the mortgages, and decrees thereunder were duly passed, whereupon the mortgagors filed answers and. cross bills, in which they alleged in the one ease that, whereas the mortgage was for $10,000, they received only $9,000, .and in the other that, while the mortgage was for $5,000, they received only $4,500, the difference in each case…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Birmingham v. Maryland Land & Permanent Homestead Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  3. Stewart v. Workingmen's Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  4. New York Security & Trust Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  5. Washington National Building & Loan Ass'n v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kramer v. McCormickCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Arnold v. Waterfield Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  3. Iowa Credit Union League v. Iowa Department of BankingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API