Legal Opinion

United States v. Labovitz

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 20, 1957No. 56-60PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

This is a motion to return or suppress evidence. Following the opinion of December 27, 1956, D.C.D.Mass., 20 F.R.D. 3, the petitioners amended their complaint and the matter proceeded to trial. The amended complaint alleges, and I find, as follows: Waltham Horological Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, hereinafter called Waltham, had and has legal title to the premises searched and the property seized. The petitioner Charles Labovitz, hereafter called Labovitz, and petitioner Doris Labovitz, together own all of the common stock of Waltham, and are, respectively,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gretsky v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
  2. Alioto v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API