Aluminum Smelters Inc. v. Twombly
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
In this action of contract for goods sold and delivered, there was a verdict for the plaintiff. The question presented by the defendant’s exceptions is the correctness of the judge’s denial of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.
It was agreed that the goods, which consisted of aluminum alloy ingots, were delivered at 380 Amory Street, Jamaica Plain, and that the total charge was fair and reasonable. The issue is whether the party liable is the defendant, who operated a sand casting business as Amory Foundry Company at 380 Amory Street, or Amory Permanent Mold Co., Inc., a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SheppardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Commonwealth v. DemboskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- W. W. Britton Inc. v. S. M. Hill Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Sellew v. Tuttle's Millinery Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Shannon v. RamseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wiley & Foss, Inc. v. Saxony Theatres, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Hilliard v. You-Do-It Electronics Hobby Center, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1969
- Millinery Manufacturing Corp. v. DiamondMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1960