Legal Opinion
Fuehrer v. Storm
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 13, 2000No. 32A01-0001-CV-27PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Chief Judge
Reece R. Fuehrer, Carolyn S. Fuehrer, Gary DeGolyer, and Bonnie J. DeGolyer (collectively, “Landowners”), appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to intervene and the trial court’s granting of William Storm, Concetta Storm, and Anna Shelton’s (collectively, “Remonstrators”) motion for partial judgment on the pleadings. Landowners raise three issues, which we consolidate and restate as:
1) whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied Landowners’ motion to intervene; and
2) whether the trial court erred when it granted the Remonstrators’ motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Prosser v. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bryant v. Lake County Trust CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Heritage House of Salem, Inc. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Developmental Disabilities Residential Facilities Council v. Metropolitan Development CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- E. N. Maisel & Associates v. Canden Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Herdrich Petroleum Corp. v. RadfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Moran Electric Service, Inc. v. Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental ManagementIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Tippecanoe Associates II, LLC v. Kimco Lafayette 671, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Moran Electric Service, Inc., and Threaded Rod Company, Inc. v. Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, City of Indianapolis, Ertel Manufacturing Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014