Ulm v. Prather
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff brought this action for an accounting and thereby a determination and adjudication of the amount to which the parties to this action are, respectively, entitled, by reason of an agreement of copartnership entered into by and between said parties on the first day of June, 1909.
Besides praying for an accounting, the complaint asks that a receiver to act pendente lite be appointed by the court to take charge of the partnership property and assets, “to properly protect and care for the same, and, as soon as practicable and for the best interests of all concerned, market the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hibernia Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. DoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Borges v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ulm v. PratherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920