Legal Opinion
McHenry v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided April 1, 1992No. 0033-92PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of conspiracy to possess a controlled substance. Punishment was assessed at confinement for ninety-nine years and a fine of $100,000.00. The Court of Appeals affirmed. McHenry v. State, 823 S.W.2d 667 (Tex.App.—Dallas, 1991).
Prior to trial, the State moved to amend the indictment. The trial court granted the motion and entered an order amending the indictment; however, the face of the indictment was never physically altered to reflect the proposed amendment. The application paragraph of the jury charge set forth…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Biggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- McHenry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
4Cited by14 opinions
- Eastep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Westfall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
- Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- McFarland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.