Biggins v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted appellant of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. The court assessed punishment at sixty years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Biggins v. State, No. 05-88-01409-CR (Tex.App.—Dallas 1990). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review urging four grounds for review. We granted Appellant’s first ground for review. We will reverse.
On January 25, 1988, Mike White, a narcotics investigator working undercover, visited a residence in Hamilton Park in Dallas County, where he discussed purchasing cocaine…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
4Cited by19 opinions
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Plata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Childress v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- McHenry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Ontiveros v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.