Legal Opinion

Biggins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1992No. 317-90PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. The court assessed punishment at sixty years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Biggins v. State, No. 05-88-01409-CR (Tex.App.—Dallas 1990). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review urging four grounds for review. We granted Appellant’s first ground for review. We will reverse.

On January 25, 1988, Mike White, a narcotics investigator working undercover, visited a residence in Hamilton Park in Dallas County, where he discussed purchasing cocaine…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Plata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Childress v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  4. McHenry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Ontiveros v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API