Legal Opinion
Sellers v. Qualls
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 3, 2001No. [No. 3, October Term, 1954.]PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrune, C. J.
The appellants are the caveators of the will of the late Cora A. Hinson Dunn, dated March 5th, 1949. The will was offered for probate in the Orphans’ Court of Baltimore County; but because of the filing of a notice of caveat, followed by the filing of an actual caveat, issues as to the validity of the will were framed in customary form and were transmitted to the Circuit Court for Baltimore County for trial before a jury. Only two issues were contested. These were mental capacity and undue influence. The trial court sustained objections to testimony by two of the appellants, each a lay…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Davis v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1833
- Higgins v. CarltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Griffith v. DiffenderfferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Harris v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Berry v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Arbogast, Exec. v. MacMillanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Masius v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- INGALLS, OF ESTATE OF INGALLS v. Trustees of Mt. Oak Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Hill v. LewisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- West v. Fidelity-Baltimore National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.