Bolls v. Packard Electric
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WINGATE, District Judge.
Before the court is the motion of the defendants Packard Electric and General Motors Corporation (hereinafter “Packard”) for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b),1 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By her lawsuit, plaintiff Gloria Bolls, a former employee of Packard, sues Packard for breach of contract. On or about March 20, 1992, Bolls, then a Packard employee, submitted a suggestion, pursuant to General Motor’s Suggestion Plan (hereinafter “Plan”), for improving Packard’s operations. Plaintiff says she should have been compensated under…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Transamerica Ins. Co. v. AvenellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Johnston v. City of Houston, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.