Legal Opinion
Franklin v. City of Slidell
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 27, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
CARL J. BARBIER, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 43), filed by Defendants, the City of Slidell and six of its employees. Plaintiff has filed an opposition (Rec. Doc. 44). The Defendants’ motion was set for hearing, on the briefs, on June 19, 2013. Having considered the motion and legal memoranda, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Defendants’ motion should be *647GRANTED IN PART for reasons explained more fully below.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND BACKGROUND FACTS
On July 26, 2012, Plaintiff, Troy Franklin, filed the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Delta & Pine Land Co. v. Nationwide Agribusiness InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- David Wayne Gibson Jr. v. American Travel Associates, ET AL.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
- Parker v. Benteler SteelDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019