Legal Opinion

Babcock v. Barnhart

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided February 6, 2006No. 02 CV 6540LPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that Jerry Babcock (“plaintiff’) is not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) or Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits.

Both the Commissioner and plaintiff have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). For the reasons discussed below, the Commission er’s motion is denied,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Conlin v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
  2. Hamedallah ex rel. E.B. v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
  3. Perez v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
  4. Bedoya v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
  5. Chrzanowski v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API