Legal Opinion
Price v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 6, 1984No. 40809PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, Justice.
Price and several others were arrested and charged with shooting over baited land in violation of OCGA § 27-3-9 (b). Demurrers to the indictments were filed alleging the statute in question was unconstitutional. The trial court overruled the demurrers holding the law to be constitutional. We granted an application for interlocutory appeal and now affirm.
1. Price contends that the language of the statute itself violates due process because of its vagueness and failure to give fair notice as to the proscribed activity. OCGA § 27-3-9 provides: “(a) It shall be unlawful for any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Stull v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Bullock v. City of DallasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BraddySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Hargrove v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Conyers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Izzo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Blackston v. State of Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.