Izzo v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Justice.
This appeal involves an attack on the constitutionality of OCGA § 16-12-32 (b). The trial court held the statute constitutional, and we affirm.
OCGA § 16-12-32 (b) provides, in relevant part, that “all property used in, intended for use in, used to facilitate, or derived from or realized through a violation of this article or which is located within any gambling place ... is declared to be contraband and may be seized and forfeited as provided in this Code section.” (Emphasis supplied.)
OCGA § 16-12-32 (a) defines “property” as being “any personal property of any type, tangible or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gouge v. City of SnellvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Sustakovitch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Lamar v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Thelen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Catoosa County v. R.N. Talley Properties, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.