Legal Opinion
Robertson v. Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1946No. 11255PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
Appellee, Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Company, hereinafter called the Company, for many years has carried on a large scale low-grade gold mining operation in Alaska. The recovery from all metals contained in the ore mined varied between 90 and 95 cents per ton. To operate profitably with such low-grade ore required the handling of a large tonnage each day and that costs be kept at a minimum.
Prior to the adoption of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., the, regular work day consisted of eight-hour shifts. After the adoption of said Act the Company put in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- L. Mets Lerwill, Charles M. Perry, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Employees of Inflight Motion Pictures, Inc. v. Inflight Motion Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Anthony J. Caserta v. Home Lines Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- F. W. Stock & Sons, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Burke v. Mesta MacH. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Kemp v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.