Legal Opinion
All v. McComas
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 21, 1932No. [Nos. 38, 39, April Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
By her last will and testament, duly probated, Sarah A. Stembler appointed Christopher R. Wattenscheidt executor and trustee, and excused him from giving bond. Code, art. 93, sec. 42; Neighbors v. Beck, 162 Md. 362, 159 A. 748. It was also provided that, in case of any sales made by the said executor or trustee in the exercise of any powers conferred on him, the purchasers woxdd not be required to see to the application of the purchase money.
After the misappropriation by Wattenscheidt of funds belonging to the estate, the appellant, William L. All, was appointed administrator c. t. a. and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- American Bonding Co. v. National Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Calvert Bank v. J. Katz & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- First Denton National Bank v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. CahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kann v. KannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- National Casualty Co. v. Caswell & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Goldsborough v. De WittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Board of the County Commissioners v. First National Bank of ThermopolisWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Gordon v. Hamilton Savings & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.