Legal Opinion
Goldsborough v. De Witt
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 12, 1937No. [Nos. 37-39, October Term, 1936.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.
Charles Shirley Goldsborough, of Talbot County, died testate on July 23rd, 1930. He named his legal advisers and friends, Edward De Witt and Stephen J. McGarrigle, two attorneys at law of New York City, his executors, and stated that they were not to be required to give bond. The will was admitted to probate, and the executors qualified by executing separate bonds for the payment of the debts, taxes, and assessments due by the deceased, and tax on commissions, as was made necessary by the statutory law of Maryland. Code, art. 93, sec. 42; art. 81, secs. 101, 102, 103, Supp. 1935 (sections…
2Cases cited99 opinions
- Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- In the Matter, Etc., of Estate of WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Whiting v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Gardner's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bastian v. LaffinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Green v. LombardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Carrier v. Crestar Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Severn v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Heill v. StaniewskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.