People v. Handley
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We again address the issue examined in People v Hurst, 396 Mich 1; 238 NW2d 6 (1976); People v Mays, 407 Mich 619; 288 NW2d 207 (1980); and People v West, 408 Mich 332; 291 NW2d 48 (1980): what may the trial judge properly say to the jury with regard to the order of its deliberations on the main charge and a lesser included offense?
I
The defendant was tried on charges of first-degree murder 1 and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. 2 The trial judge instructed the jury on possible verdicts of first-degree murder, second-degree murder, and manslaughter. As to how the jury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. JankowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. MaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. WestMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. HandleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by41 opinions
- Green v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. LeBlancArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. WoodsMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- Meade v. LavigneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.